Are you finding you need several science degrees to have an informed opinion these days? I have started googling the pros and cons of several issues and, on the GM debate, found www.citizenshipfoundation.org.uk, an award-wining UK website.
The Foundation’s Summary Of Main Arguments
For GM Crops
- Crops can be engineered to be pest/disease resistant and so reduce or eliminate the need to use pesticides or herbicides. This reduction in chemicals can benefit the environment and wildlife
- GM foods could be made healthier than conventional foods by, for example, modifying them to include extra vitamins and nutrients
- Since the wide scale consumption of food from GM crops began some seven years ago there have been no substantiated cases of harm to human health
- Crops could be modified to reduce or eliminate allergic affects, e.g. by removing the allergic properties from nuts or altered so they have medicinal benefits, e.g. contain vaccines for specific diseases
- Crops could be modified to enable them to survive and grow in unfavourable conditions and withstand drought or floods. This could be particularly beneficial to farmers in the developing world
- Crops can be created that give higher yields and better quality food. This is particularly important to help meet the demand for food by an expanding world population
Against GM Crops
- The creation of pest or herbicide resistant GM crops could result in “superbugs” or “superweeds” that evolve to be resistant to the chemicals or toxins developed in conjunction with GM crops
- The growing of GM crops could result in cross-pollination between GM crops and non-GM and organic crops thereby contaminating them
- Because it is a new technology, there is a need to adopt the precautionary principle. The long term impacts on human health, food safety or the environment cannot be accurately predicted
- It is too risky to allow the commercial growing of GM crops at this stage
GM crops which have additional proteins or altered genetic composition could result in toxic and allergic reactions in certain people
- GM crops will result in increased dependency on transnational biotech corporations to supply seed and chemicals, the result being monocultures. This will prove particularly costly and damaging to small scale farmers in the developing world who rely on saving seed from year to year and often plant a diversity of crops
- GM is not the key to food security and GM crop developments to date have largely benefited northern countries and markets, not small scale farmers in the developing world. Food security lies in the more equal distribution of food, access to land and money by the poor
UK Citizens’ Juries
Two separate ‘citizens juries’ that met in Hertfordshire and Tyneside sought to provide concerned citizens with information to help them develop arguments to influence those with power over their lives.
Witnesses were selected to provide a range of views, with no single perspective or policy option being over-represented.
Both juries called for:
- A halt to the sale of GM foods currently available and to the proposed commercial growing of GM crops, a conclusion based on the lack of evidence of benefit and the precautionary principle
- Long-term research into the real risks of damage to the environment and the potential for harm
- An end to blanket assertions that GM crops are necessary to feed the starving in the Third World, given the complex social and economic factors that lie behind such hunger
Further information is available from the GM Jury website.
A HUGE Reading List On The Issue
Curt Rosengren – a blogger who is not a big fan of the idea of GM, but who admits his is ‘more of a knee-jerk opinion than a well-informed view’ – gives an amazing reading list…if you have a few hours!
GM Crops: The arguments pro and con
The Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Genetic engineering: The controversy
BBC: Food under the microscope
Genetically modified food: Pros and cons
Pros and cons of genetic engineering
The pros and cons of GM food
GM Products: Benefits and Controversies
Weighing Pros and Cons of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa
Pros, cons of modified food
The pros and cons of GE food
Pro-GM
GM benefits outweigh risks
Study finds benefits in GM crops
A report on genetically engineered crops
Monsanto video gallery
The Alliance for Better Foods
The benefits of GM crops
Anti-GM
Who benefits from GM crops?
Genetically engineered food
Genetically engineered (GE) food – safety problems
Bio-technology myths
Statements on the dangers of GM by scientists
Debunking the myths of genetic engineering in food crops
The risks of genetic engineering
Myths spread by the pro-GM, anti-organic movement
2 Comments
Friends of the Earth comprehensive report “Who benefits from GM?” is so clear and concise that I am totally bewildered about how the Victn. Govt. passed this technology for use in our State. We are in danger of repeating all the mistakes of other countries and there seems nothing we can do to stop it.
GM food tastes bad.